A World of Inequality
The truth about inequality
- The great promise of communism in the 20th century was the removal of inequalities. However if failed comprehensively by 1991.
- The worldwide spread of capitalism and LPG wad the next big promise. But sadly data show that the world income inequality has grown and diminished.
- The seven key truths about income inequalities are:
- Income inequalities is lowest in Europe and highest in Middle East.
- The top 10% income share is 37% in Europe, 41% in China and 56% in India.
- In the Middle East top 10% cornered 61% of National Income.
- Since 1980s inequality has sharply risen in India, China, Russia, and North America.
- Regions like Brazil, Middle East and Sub-Sharan Africa are the inequality frontiers, as they never experienced post World War-II egalitarian.
- In 1980 the top 1% income share was roughly 10% in US and Western Europe, but today it is roughly 20% in US and 16% in Western Europe.
- The bottom 50% of share in America steeply dropped from 20% in 1980 to ~13% today.
The Elephant curve of inequality
- The x-axis as a world population divided into 100 groups of equal population size increasing from left to right.
- The top 1% was divided into 10 groups, and the richest again into 10.
- The topmost was again divided into 10 groups (equal population size). And the topmost was again divided into 10 groups.
- The y-axis shows the income growth of an individual in any group between 1980-2016.
- The top 1% captured 27% of all global growth 1980-2016.
- The bottom 50% captured 12%.
- In the bottom 50% most were from India and China.
- The rest were the squeezed bottom 90% from America and Western Europe who saw the lowest average growth in income level.
- This graph shows that from 1980 to 2016 the global top 1% receive 15%-22% of total income share. The global bottom 50% were always lower than 10%.
Learnings:
Private versus Public Capital
- Capital is anything that enhances a person's power to do economically useful work.
- It can be of two types - Private to Public (Government).
- It is seen that inequality is driven by unequal ownership of capital, and since 1980s large transfer of public to private wealth in all the countries.
- In rich nations now, public wealth is negative to zero. governments do not have the capability to tackle inequality anymore.
- The sum of public and private wealth is equal to National Wealth
- Net Private Wealth is equal to the difference of Net Private Assets and Net Private Debts (Net Private Wealth = Net Private Assets - Net Private Debts)
- Net Public Wealth is equal to the difference of Net Public Assets and Net Public Debts (Net Public Wealth = Net Public Assets - Net Public Debts)
- The ratio of Net Private Wealth to the Net National Income shows how much more powerful are individual compared to government
- When the net Public Wealth reduces, it diminishes the government ability to:
- Regulate the economy
- Redistribute Income
- Mitigate Rising Inequality
The Indian situation
- Income inequalities have reached historically high levels. The Share of top 1% is 22% of National Income while the top 10% earning 56%.
- Deregulation and economic reforms have increased inequality
- Post 1980s, the top 0.1% have captured more growth than combined bottom 50%, the middle 40% is stuck.
- Income Tax was introduced in India in 1922 and tax department has regularly published statistics except for the period 2000-2010.
- Till Rajiv Gandhi came along in 1980s, India was a close, inward looking and a highly regulated economy hence inequalities were low but post 1980 huge LPG (Liberalisation, Privatisation, Globalisation) reforms saw the unwanted fallout rising inequality
- The seventh five year plan (1985-1990) relaxed regulations, increased external borrowing and increased exports. Top marginal income tax fell from 97.5% to 50%.
- By 1990 thing started changing disruptly. Due to D-D-D-D (Delicensing-Deinvestment-Denationalisation-Decontrol), we saw capital gaining over labour
Parameter | In 1983 | In 2015* |
---|---|---|
Top 1% earned | 10% of National Income | 21.3% of National Income |
Top 10% earned | 35% of National Income | 56.1% of National Income |
Middle 40% earned | 43% of National Income | 29% of National Income |
Bottom 50% earned | 21.8% of National Income | 14.7% of National Income |
* later date data not available |
The future of Global Income Inequality
- Convergence forces like growth in an emerging economy, and divergence forces like growing inequality within the nation will shape the future of global inequality.
- Until the "within country" inequality are tackled well, global income inequalities will keep rising. A nightmarish scenario will be if in 2050 top 1% hold 24% and bottom 50% less than 9% of the total National Income.
- Three scenario exists:
- All countries follow their own inequality
- All countries follow US inequality trend
- All countries follow EU inequality trend
- Ideal Outcome: Scenario 3 where the gap between top 1% and bottom 50% will only by 19% -(minus) 13.5% only
- How to tackle top income groups:
- Marginal Income Tax
- Inheritance Tax
Tackling inequality
- More equal access to education and well paying jobs is the key to fighting stagnation and sluggishness
- Final Solutions:
- Progressive income tax is a good option
- Tackling massive tax evasion is a must
- Access to education and good job are the only guarantee to large term capability creation
- Reducing public debt is important so that the governments can invest more in the future
Comments
Post a Comment